757?
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:45 am
The link isnt working for me
EDIT: Nah sorry its working
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:11 pm
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:49 pm
Makes u really think "What the hell is going on".
Really don't know what to say, evidence speaks for its self.
Really don't know what to say, evidence speaks for its self.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 5:59 pm
yeah man, djeez im mindblown after reading that stuff 
makes u think about the stuff they're keeping from us
i think the cia or something did this crap
makes u think about the stuff they're keeping from usi think the cia or something did this crap
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:24 pm
Could it have all been goverment setup?
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:14 pm
It really wouldn't surprise me. In the words of Immortal Technique, "Without 9/11 you couldn't have a war in Iraq". And what with the Bush administration being a bunch of lying bastards it seems even more likely. Nice find, Flynn.cutthecashflow wrote:Could it have all been goverment setup?
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:25 pm
Im guessing this is another conspiracy website, saying no plane ever crashed into the Pentagon
That evidence is pretty circumstantial (sp?) But then how do you explain the lightpoles on the freeway by the Pentagon, ripped off the ground? ONLY a plane as wide as a Boeing 757 could have even CONTACTED them at the same time.
and as for "they mess up the ground" well thats not very well thought through, the plane didnt hit the ground outside the pentagon, it actually hit inbetween the first and second floors, I could find you a bunch of pictures of people picking up peices of the plane, too. You cant really see a lot with those panned out pictures. Since the FIRST PICTURE on the actual page is obviously PHOTOSHOPPED i dont know how reliable this site is (ive never seen it before)
there were eyewitnesses, the 757 flew barely over the freeway, before crashing into the outer Strut on the lower floors. A missile could NOT have ripped those lightpoles off.
some more links... looky
http://www.overclockedgaming.com/pentag ... #Preloader
That evidence is pretty circumstantial (sp?) But then how do you explain the lightpoles on the freeway by the Pentagon, ripped off the ground? ONLY a plane as wide as a Boeing 757 could have even CONTACTED them at the same time.
and as for "they mess up the ground" well thats not very well thought through, the plane didnt hit the ground outside the pentagon, it actually hit inbetween the first and second floors, I could find you a bunch of pictures of people picking up peices of the plane, too. You cant really see a lot with those panned out pictures. Since the FIRST PICTURE on the actual page is obviously PHOTOSHOPPED i dont know how reliable this site is (ive never seen it before)
there were eyewitnesses, the 757 flew barely over the freeway, before crashing into the outer Strut on the lower floors. A missile could NOT have ripped those lightpoles off.
some more links... looky
http://www.overclockedgaming.com/pentag ... #Preloader
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:37 pm
perhaps, but that doenst explain where the tail and wings went... i mean its clear the wings should have ripped away a pretty large stretch of the outer wall, although we only see a 'pretty round' hole, if you get my point?
and about the freeway lights, wasnt the shockwave enough to throw some of them over ?
and about the freeway lights, wasnt the shockwave enough to throw some of them over ?
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:15 pm
They were planted in cement, a missile wouldnt have enough force to blow over more than one of them. Either the planes wings hit the poles or the blast ripped them out, Im pretty sure it was the wings. the 757 was supposedly, no more than 50 feet above the ground which would explain both the lightpoles, and the crashing into above the first story.
I still havent found the pictures of scrap metal being picked up but Ill fiind it soon.
I still havent found the pictures of scrap metal being picked up but Ill fiind it soon.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:18 pm
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:06 pm
okie (keekeeekee) what you dont realize is our all juist talking jibber jabber that doesnt even makr sense?
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 3:01 am
Thats all my english teacher would talk about. Snopes this and Snopes that she was weird.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 3:45 am
finally found the pics!!! You can see the parts of the plane close up on this page.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 7:44 am
how are you sure that that is a piece of plane.....it looks like a burnt piece of debris. i'm not saying that i disagree with you but i need something a little more solid than that. its funny seeing both sides of this argument. usually conspiracists will go to any length to prove their story even if it does mean doctoring information and fudging images........its also funny that you have two different types of eyewitness reports like "it was a 757" or "it was a missle"
i still can't get over the fact that a 757 going that fast would make a hole that small even with reinforced walls surely it would have made more of a mess, like debris and shit everywhere? then again i don't really know what a building like that looks like when its been hit by a plane or a missle.
i dunno.....i'm trying not to get sucked by either theory, i thought i post it just to stir the pot a little. its obvious that its worked lol
i still can't get over the fact that a 757 going that fast would make a hole that small even with reinforced walls surely it would have made more of a mess, like debris and shit everywhere? then again i don't really know what a building like that looks like when its been hit by a plane or a missle.
i dunno.....i'm trying not to get sucked by either theory, i thought i post it just to stir the pot a little. its obvious that its worked lol
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:44 pm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
Another vey intersting link. This is about the five israelis who got arrested for planting a car bomb on the George Washington bridge. Enjoy!
Edit: Bin Laden denies that he was behind the attacks in this link. Unfortunately we all saw the video which was translated incorrectly. I'm sure it was on honest mistake on behalf of the media
"Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport".
On 11 September, while Al-Qaeda's planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Carlyle Group hosted a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama
Makes you think...........
Sorry to keep on editing I just don't want people to miss such intersesting facts. The two above quotes are from http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/inside.html
Another vey intersting link. This is about the five israelis who got arrested for planting a car bomb on the George Washington bridge. Enjoy!
Edit: Bin Laden denies that he was behind the attacks in this link. Unfortunately we all saw the video which was translated incorrectly. I'm sure it was on honest mistake on behalf of the media
"Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport".
On 11 September, while Al-Qaeda's planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Carlyle Group hosted a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama
Makes you think...........
Sorry to keep on editing I just don't want people to miss such intersesting facts. The two above quotes are from http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/inside.html