www.weedguru.com

See what these guys have too say..

http://paranoia.lycaeum.org/marijuana/usage/bong-study

...
....
.....

That cant be right... but thats also from 8 years ago, what did they know back then?

Also scientists have been wrong over and over about weed, but fuck it doesnt make a difference im gonna smoke anyway

That cant be right if they were ineffective like they say it is then how come it gets you high on the second hit?

Damn, first hit, i havent been able to get high like that in a loooooooong time accept when i have been drinkin and ive come down from that

i wonder why they've kept it that long. well it is the goverment.

I see the logic in the argument that bongs could be counterproductive, but that isn't my experience at all. I get higher for longer off bong rips than I do off anything else. I figure it's because you can take bigger hits from a bong because the smoke is cooled, and I take monster hits anyway, so you take in more smoke per hit.

Well, bongs seem to get me very stoned. And also they must be screening something bad out, as the water turns black.

On another note, the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies sounds brilliant.

i think it men t it is inefective in protecting you from "harnful tars" but it deffinatlly get s you high.. you dont need to conduct an experiement to know that

luckystoner88 wrote:i think it men t it is inefective in protecting you from "harnful tars" but it deffinatlly get s you high.. you dont need to conduct an experiement to know that

agreed

government get everythin wrong, look at the latest fuck up, thye have discoverd that passive smokin` wont cause you to have any body problems, and it isnt bad for poeple sat around you