THC: inhibits lung tumour growth....

[SpRi7e]

So if they randomly chose humans compared to animals and they test you with experiments that probably would kill you, would you do it?

[Weedguru_Fire_Inside]

would i fuck. i said paedophiles man. rapists too. people who deserve to die should be tested on, instead of these innocent animals. why would they randomly choose people?

the point i'm trying to make is that animals don't deserve to be tested on. they never signed up for it, they never asked us to test on them in any way.

i dont know how a person could possibly think a chimp should undergo cosmetic trial as opposed to a rapist or paedophile. understand?

[WeedGuru_Flow]

^I can understand that.

I mean, most prisons are over their maximum capacity anyway, so why not test drugs/cosmetics/whatever on them? What's the best way to study the side effects/damage/good it does to a human being than using a human being as a guinea pig?

And I think it's a pretty good punishment, the higher the crime the more pain!

[SpRi7e]

Yea but there are worse crimes compared to rape and pedophiles. I agree what your saying but there's worse people than rapists and stuff.

[dylann]

okay i dont understand how this topic came to pedophiles and rapists and stuff.. but..

i think itll be good if they do use thc to cure cancer, and it will show the people actually how much the government has lied to us.

[President Beavis]

I bet a lot of strait edge people would still demonize it regardless of what proof is put up against them, people like to believe they had it all right the first time they made a judgement on a topic.

[Weedguru_Fire_Inside]

Yea but there are worse crimes compared to rape and pedophiles. I agree what your saying but there's worse people than rapists and stuff.

indeed there are. paedophiles were just an example, as they are just one group of people who IN MY OPINION, do not deserve to live. i should have said fascists in general, rather than racists.

[SpRi7e]

They should just make the company's have volunteers and pay them a crap load of money to test on them, it'll solve everyones problem and the people get some extra cash with a 3rd leg or something like that

[TmD]

I bet a lot of strait edge people would still demonize it regardless of what proof is put up against them, people like to believe they had it all right the first time they made a judgement on a topic.

There are always those kind of people, alot of religious people usually and they try to act like some book written by people they never knew or meet have more say than a modern day scientist.

[Funk Doctor]

Back on topic.

Just because THC in itself inhibits cancer growth doesn't mean you should start smoking mass amounts of weed. There are a buttload of other substances in weed that cause cancer.

But as far as vaporizers go... burn away!