www.weedguru.com

dude I said "I am" in reference to you saying address the debate at hand. The rest is a new sentence ask Caro about my lack of appreciation for punctuation we call it $tuanese what I speak it aint quite sense!

As for the weapon reference I will find an alternate source, I boil it down to it all depends on what point of view you take!

Well if you're a wackjob with hardly any military training and experience, the AK-47 is the tool for you. It's easy to use and it does a fair job. If you know what you're doing, get yourself an M-16. It's a bit harder to use, but if you know how, you're pretty much invincible versus an insurgent with a Khalashnikov.

The AK-47 is a pretty good choice for close combat in an urban environment, as the spread pattern of the bullets is wider than that of the M-16, but that also means that taking out a single target like a soldier is far harder.

A shotty AK-47 like those insurgents use won't pierce a kevlar vest or helm either, so you'd have to be aiming for softer spots like arms and legs, and a soldier with a bullet in his leg can still shoot back at you.

Funk doc is right.

Sorry stu I think your wrong on this one though.

The m-16 is a better gun.

Herbal $tu wrote:dude I said "I am" in reference to you saying address the debate at hand. The rest is a new sentence ask Caro about my lack of appreciation for punctuation we call it $tuanese what I speak it aint quite sense!

Oh ok man its just that I rad it like 10 times and was still confused! I wasn't being bitchy or anything. I'm not one to mention stuff like that just for sake of it, I was just trying to see what you were refering to! Its all good anyways

LAUGHING HERE TOO BUD!!