Films to watch whilst stoned...
Moderator: Moderators
- Daddy
- The Duke of Dope

- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 5:55 pm
- Location: Manchester England / Australia
- Contact:
- Jimbo Baggins
- Bonghead

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 7:19 pm
- Contact:
- Daddy
- The Duke of Dope

- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 5:55 pm
- Location: Manchester England / Australia
- Contact:
- lisa_is_stoned
- Casual toker

- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 12:44 am
- Location: Manchester, UK
- Contact:
-
big rob
- Bonghead

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:02 am
- Contact:
why should i watch who i call an amateur? gonna come beat me up? i'm terrorfied. anyways, jimbo i think you must be from somewhere like lancashire seeing as how both the movies were based on theft. i know for sure that the cunts in manchester will steal anything that isnt nailed down.
you said if id prefer to watch a christian slater movie rather than a de niro or a pacino movie then its fine by you. to me that sounds like you're saying just because de niro and pacino are better actors, the movie is going to be better entertainment. think about it, its a pretty amateur thing to say.
if you judge a movie by the reputation of the cast, then surely movies starring actors of higher quality than the two you mentioned would be prefered by you. i hope that makes sense. it does to me.
if you wanna keep talking about it, i have a movie that is by far the greatest of recent times. that is if you judge your movies by your opinions of the actors. i wont say who i mean if you wanna leave it there.
you said if id prefer to watch a christian slater movie rather than a de niro or a pacino movie then its fine by you. to me that sounds like you're saying just because de niro and pacino are better actors, the movie is going to be better entertainment. think about it, its a pretty amateur thing to say.
if you judge a movie by the reputation of the cast, then surely movies starring actors of higher quality than the two you mentioned would be prefered by you. i hope that makes sense. it does to me.
if you wanna keep talking about it, i have a movie that is by far the greatest of recent times. that is if you judge your movies by your opinions of the actors. i wont say who i mean if you wanna leave it there.
-
Dont know
- Casual toker

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 4:00 am
- Contact:
-
Dont know
- Casual toker

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 4:00 am
- Contact:
-
Dont know
- Casual toker

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 4:00 am
- Contact:
-
Dont know
- Casual toker

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 4:00 am
- Contact:
- clashcityrocker
- Sir Toke-a-lot

- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 12:14 am
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
- Daddy
- The Duke of Dope

- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 5:55 pm
- Location: Manchester England / Australia
- Contact:
-
big rob
- Bonghead

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:02 am
- Contact:
GAY DADDY wrote:
i know the things i said about them movies are right. your mate baggins said a pretty stupid thing and i clamped him on it. i know theres PROBABLY nothing you can say without resorting to my mum. how pathetic is that? do you think your great or whatever by saying shit about my parents. thats the most childish thing anyone can do. u r from manchester though. oh well that explains it.
oh and dont know, i know everyopne has different opinions. i respect that too. jimbo baggins started by calling people amateurs because of the movies they prefer. get what i mean? i didnt say anything until i was called an amateur. if you read carefully everything that has been written, im sure you will understand.
**something i forgot to add. seeing as how someone put it "pacino vs slater". whoever it was, theyre dumb as fuck. i already know that al pacino is a better actor, that doesnt mean his movies are better though. thats exactly what i was trying to get across before. how about hopkins vs pacino. i think we all know who the best actor is there. this was a post about good movies, not good actors though.
i couldnt give a fuck who im starting to annoy. if you cant handle what i have to say, then dont read what i write.Big rob really would keep it down as you have even started to annoy me now we all now you are from yorkshire so your mum is proberly your aunty so your a bunch of inbread dicks....
Now im gonna leave it there if you want to take a shot do it but watch it.
i know the things i said about them movies are right. your mate baggins said a pretty stupid thing and i clamped him on it. i know theres PROBABLY nothing you can say without resorting to my mum. how pathetic is that? do you think your great or whatever by saying shit about my parents. thats the most childish thing anyone can do. u r from manchester though. oh well that explains it.
oh and dont know, i know everyopne has different opinions. i respect that too. jimbo baggins started by calling people amateurs because of the movies they prefer. get what i mean? i didnt say anything until i was called an amateur. if you read carefully everything that has been written, im sure you will understand.
**something i forgot to add. seeing as how someone put it "pacino vs slater". whoever it was, theyre dumb as fuck. i already know that al pacino is a better actor, that doesnt mean his movies are better though. thats exactly what i was trying to get across before. how about hopkins vs pacino. i think we all know who the best actor is there. this was a post about good movies, not good actors though.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users