Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:02 pm
by Rory
lol!
deathstar high!!!!
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:11 pm
by Dakine
anyone ever had the meteor high? that's nice that one.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:13 pm
by Rory
Yeah dude give you a fiery tail

Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:22 pm
by captainMorton
To tell you the truth, i really dont give a fuck if americans landed on the moon or not, now if it was a canadian shuttle(however unlikely that is) I can almost garuntee that there would have been weed on the moon, now just imagine, hot box a space suit.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:23 pm
by Weedguru_Falkon
I dont believe that we landed on the moon, and the ONLY way to prove it 100% would be to visit it yourself. thats the only way.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:25 pm
by Weedguru~N0isenkiss3s
Weedguru_Falkon wrote:I dont believe that we landed on the moon, and the ONLY way to prove it 100% would be to visit it yourself. thats the only way.
I sense a CHALLENGE

Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:30 pm
by Dakine
these conspiracys are fucking stupid.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:38 pm
by Rory
Dakine wrote:these conspiracys are fucking stupid.
They're for people who wish they had real things to bitch about...
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:47 pm
by captainMorton
hell, i could come up with thousands of conspiracys right now, for instance:
hitler is really george bush jr. jr.(currant pres son) with a time machine.
cancer does not exist its just government agents going around poisioning people.
the canadian government is breeding sasquatches for home defence
see?? anything can be a conspiracy, hell I could be a government agent just pretending to smoke so I can lure you guys into a false sence of sequrity so I can aresst you all!!! *muh hahahahahah!!!!!*
oops, no evil laugh, bad me bad me
p.s. im not really a government agent just pretending to smoke so I can lure you guys into a false sence of sequrity so I can aresst you all, i was just saying that to prove a point... or was I?? *muh hahahahahah!!!!!*
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:17 pm
by Dakine
Rory wrote:Dakine wrote:these conspiracys are fucking stupid.
They're for people who wish they had real things to bitch about...
qft. mine and rory's!

Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:37 am
by CaNuCk
The flag moving thing is ridiculous...it is widely known the flag is some form of metal and shaped like a moving flag to give it a heroic appearance.
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:40 am
by CoreyTheCracker
stnoed wrote:i hate conspiracy theories. there are some idiots that think 9/11 was staged by the us govt. also. moon landing was real. 911 was real. ... .... give me a break and stop with the rediculous conspiracys
9/11 was planed by the goverment.. there is alot of proof and im not tryin to make enemys when im new here but have you seen loose change videos and other videos like that? i really dont care if we landed on the moon or not but to think that the goverment is so corrupt to kill thousands of innocent americans is just crazy so i really hope that im wrong about that

Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:53 am
by buttermilk
Weedguru~N0isenkiss3s wrote:Weedguru_Falkon wrote:I dont believe that we landed on the moon, and the ONLY way to prove it 100% would be to visit it yourself. thats the only way.
I sense a CHALLENGE

Alright guys, here's the game plan. We make a huge ramp, buy some space suits, then run off the ramp as fast as he can and hope we get our asses to the moon!

Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 2:09 pm
by Certified-Nutter
if they did or they didnt, i dont kno, i dont care, goverments are always bullshiting, and they where in a arms war against russia at the time, both trying to get into space at the same time, russia was the first to get a guy in space, so america had to best that, now they could pretend this whole thing, but what good is that going to do them when a russian cosmonaut orbits by the moon and sees no flag or anything, i think the us are liars, but i also think the us dont wanna b proven liars, and the lunar landing is something so easy to prove wrong i do not think them stupid enough to pretend it.
as for the multiple lighting, theres no lighting on the moon, other than the sun, so they Must of set up a parimeter with spot lights just so they dont get lost, i mean, first time you've landed on a moon, its extremely dark, and your just gonna go wander off exloring, no u put up lights.
the flag moving, now this is a difficult one, i mean, if they went through all the trouble of setting it all up, i think someone would have the intelligence to not allow the flag to move, and being as there is absolutly no resistance in space (you kick a ball, it will go on forever start of thing) then whats to say that moving the flag prior to setting it didnt start a resonence within the flag.
picture quality, we all kno that film freezes up in space, it cant survive up there and cannot be used for filmin, that means they would have to use a digital camera to take any pictures at all, and as you can all probably guess, the digital cameras back then would have been shit, that is another reason why the picture is so bad of quality, its also an answer for how no stars where seen, in a poor quality camera, it wouldnt of been able to focus on such small dots of light.
now i havnt seen the video, and as i said, i dont really care, the goverment lies alot yes, and i choose not to trust them, but also, knowing the curcumstances the US was in at the time, i do not think they would have risked, nor could they have afforded to fake this, cos if the russians would have found out at the time (which woulda been easy to do) well, the arms race coulda turned out way differently.
but anyway. meh, who cares, as hashpipe sed, no weed on the moon
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:02 pm
by hashpipe
no hash either. and the movement in the flag was just from vibrations from folding out the aluminium flagholder thing. or at least so they say at discovery channel